On Jan 8, 6:55 pm, samsloan wrote:
Let's make it simple, Mr. Blair:

1. Did you or did you not write postings to 19 Wikipedia
administrators or editors pointing out that I had reinstated
biographies of Ali Nihat Yazici, Julio
Cesar Ingolotti, Panupand Vijjuprabha and Geoffrey Borg?

Answer that question "yes" or "no".

In other words, stop playing games with swords.

2. Is it not a fact that promptly after you wrote these 19
administrators, User:JzG "salted the earth" with respect to the
biographies of Ali Nihat Yazici, Julio
Cesar Ingolotti, Panupand Vijjuprabha and Geoffrey Borg, meaning that
no biography of those persons can ever be posted to Wikipedia again?

Answer "yes" or "no".

3. Is it not a fact that Bill Goichberg rewarded you for this deed by
appointing you as a member of the Forum Oversight Committee thereby
giving you the power to remove postings by Sam Sloan from the USCF
Issues Forum?

Answer that question "yes" or "no".

We will await your answers.


This posting makes it clear that SS has no clue what
he is talking about.

AFTER having already issued accusations, he now
"inquires" whether or not they were justified! It is as
though the man were traveling in time, and like Merlin
the wizard, he knows nothing of the past, yet he can
"see" crimes from the future, or at least he thinks he
can.

Traditionally, the accusation comes after-the-fact,
and the accused is never asked to testify against
himself. Indeed, the compilation of evidence of the
crime is the job of the accuser. In this "case", I get
the sense of a paranoid nutter who accuses people
of conspiring against him, hoping they will "confess"
and thereby justify his irrational fears.

Nearly-an-IM Innes has given his bizarre version of
the story, claiming that SS wrote four perfectly good
biographies which were then maliciously deleted by
LB et al. To this I can only respond: "why does
Wikipedia allow such malicious deletions?" I ask
this because it makes no sense for Mr. Sloan's vast
creative work to be maliciously deleted, yet that is
precisely what he and his few supporters maintain.
The plot has Wiki as the setting, SS as hero and
artist, with LB as evil villain? Who would pay to see
such lunacy? Even if Kurt Russel can be snagged
to play Sam Sloan's character, you would need an
acid-scarred, malformed dwarf with a German or
Russian accent for the part of Louis Blair. I say it
won't fly-- not unless you can get Halle Barry or
someone like that to play the love interest of both
SS and LB.


-- take three