ROTFLMAO!! Your friend Susan is beyond help as are you. It has been
clearly stated by Randy Bauer and Bill G that the attorneys for the USCF
asked Truong for a statement by HIM, directly to the attorneys, denying or
admitting the Sloan allegations. Simple request. Normal request by ones
counsel in litigation. But, a request Truong can't bring HIMSELF to comply
with. Guilty people do have problems with such requests.

I suppose almost everyone here is guilty then because there have been
many posts about sloan that were pretty bad. Your trying to play with
words here. Asking troung for a statement about sloan. You can't
possibly believe it will be a positive statement.

Truong was asked by counsel to facilitate the gathering of evidence from his
IPs for use in defending against the Sloan litigation. So Susan responds by
saying sure, but not until the Sloan litigation is over.

Nothing wrong with that request.

Bull**** will only carry a person so far once the legal action commences.
Truong has reached the end of the line.

I guess you haven't lived in the US for long have you? I can find
something to sue you for or anyone. It is a sad state of affairs that
this is possible but true. There are people out there that will put
you through the legal action for no reason and make your life a
nightmare. Try bumping someones car in the rear and see what happens
if it is the wrong person. You will definitely suffer in court.

ChaChing........GUILTY

Well I do remember a dry cleaners who was being sued for 54 million
dollars because he messed up a customers pair of pants. I mean he did
mess up his pants you know and the dry cleaners offered to pay for it.
The plaintiff said heck no. But the dry cleaners were guilty. This is
what sloan seems to want to do. It sounds like sour grapes because
these guys got elected and the losers can't stand to lose power.

EZoto