View Single Post
  #2  
Old February 4th 08, 10:50 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
Brian Lafferty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,206
Default The Board refused ...

Chess One wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column, Alekhine's
Parrot, at www.chessville.com or
http://www.chessville.com/Editorials...rrot/Index.htm

reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars of USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the wrong
conclusion.


Ms. Polgar is either ignorantly incorrect or posturing for the acolytes.
There is sufficient evidence against he co-dependent true love Paulie
in the form of the Motterhead Report, Jones Report and the Ulevitch Report.

Apparently, the evidence sent to Kronenberger Trolgar was less than
persuasive.

The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data for more
than 4 months.


Really?! Who are Trolgar's experts who have been denied access to
Paulie's computer and ISP logs.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.


Suzie, to be terrific, you must be specific. Details please.


The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a lawsuit.


Oh Suzie, this has already been discussed and debunked over at the USCF
Issues Forum you claim to never read.


Susan Polgar


Now Phil........perhaps you could ask her a few questions based on the
above so that we may all laugh at her feeble attempts at evasive
answers. Thanks in advance for the anticipated humor.
Ads
 

Advertising - Buy Anything On eBay - Credit Cards - MPAA - Ringtone