View Single Post
  #26  
Old February 5th 08, 02:17 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics, rec.games.chess.misc
The Historian[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,874
Default The Board refused ...

On Feb 5, 8:53 am, "
wrote:
You can't contend that there is no evidence of Truong's guilt. There
was evidence that he falsely claimed to have a PhD; it was on his web
page. There is evidence that the mysterious posts came from his
computer; it was in the Motterhead report, and confirmed by experts.

You can try to claim that this evidence is not convincing, that it was
(somehow, for some reason, and in a strange way of putting it there
without calling attention to it for years) planted to make him look
guilty. You cannot say that there is no evidence against him, however.

I am glad you looked into Paul's soul and found it to be pure. Others
who know them do not seem convinced, and I do not think that you can
expect those who do not know the people involved to take your word on
the issue.


Jerry, I hate to intrude into this Tennessee squabble, but Truong's
soul is his concern and God's. Most of us are concerned with Truong's,
and Polgar's, actions.

Jerry Spinrad


Ads
 

MPAA - Personal Loan - 0% credit cards - Mortgage Calculator - Loans