"samsloan" wrote in message
...
On Feb 21, 1:02 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what
CPA?
What audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material?

The $2 million dollars was in cash or cash equivalents.

Since you are not a USCF member you cannot see the audited reports
that are online.

So tell us about them!

How come your representation seems to indicate that someone or other made
off with $2million cash or 'equivalents' but no-one seems to give a damn?

ROFL!!

By referencing material that others can't see, including in all the no-doubt
fascinated lawyers at misc.legal, are you not in some danger of appearing
nutz? That is a psychological term, and I apologise to alt.lawyers for using
it - my ignorance extends to not knowing their own term for your
presentation.

The losses are shown.

$2million of cash or equivalent loses are shown but no one raises an eyebrow
but you?

However, they do not show what happened to the
money.

What did happen to what money?

That is why we need the laptop computer that Frank Niro took.

That is why you want it. First though, I think you must explain why an
organisation that traded at $6million gross in its best year, and more
typically $5M, could have amassed a couple of million cash or fungible
items, then not noticed that someome had dissapeared it.

Otherwise you risk appearing daft in front of the good lawyers, raising
their own self-esteem, which I think is itself a crime!

Please elaborate rather than prognosticate. But I don't think you will since
you do not cite your references in terms of my questions; for the 4th time?

And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what CPA?
What audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material?

Did you answer any of these yet except to say 'cash or equivalent'. What
does that mean, 7 bucks of cash and $1,999,993 of equivalent?

Perhaps the lawyer folks are wondering 2 things? (a) If you can have a
couple million of fungible assets just boogaloo out of there without any CPA
or anyone else noticing, no second signature or anything like that, and (b)
your vague references to the matter which upon investigating get vaguer, as
if you were just, you know, blowing smoke - I use that anodyne term since
the usual man-to-man verbalisation may shock some alt.lawyers.

Phil Innes



Sam Sloan