On Mar 9, 7:43 pm, wrote:
On Mar 9, 7:25 pm, Brian Lafferty wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 9, 5:37 pm, wrote:
On Mar 9, 4:00 pm, Brian Lafferty wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 9, 4:39 am, Brian Lafferty wrote:
We can all honestly debate scholastics and the direction scholastics
should take. That is not the issue here. The issue is that what Mr. N.
presents himself as, is apparently not what he is.
Now that your here, Bill, tell us about those payments to Sevan M. from
ICA that were given in a manner that the IRS will be interested in. As
a CPA and president od ICA at the time, what was going on?
Dangling participle.
I believe
there were ICA members who questioned the payments at the time and who
have been harassed for wanting the payments recorded and made in the
correct manner. If you need a refresher on that issue, I can help with
documentation. We'll leave the Caveman for later.
There was the famous "puzzled" thread. I have no idea whether
"puzzled" was an ICA member.
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000040#...
I did not, and would not, countenance a structure that would result in
personal inurement to the organizer.
Please help with documentation: it's tax season. :-)
There's no hurry. It's always audit season for the IRS.
One should be careful with one's statements when the reputation of
others are at stake. As I have done before, I invite you to provide
evidence for your remarks above, or to withdraw them. I have nothing
to hide with respect to the matter referenced above, and really don't
take kindly to having the character of my friends smeared baselessly.
No need to appease me, however: let the truth guide your response.
More reading for you:
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000088#...
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000503#...
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...1;t=000486;p=1
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000263#...
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000438#...
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000520#...
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...1;t=000552;p=1
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000347#...
http://www.ilchess.org/cgi/ultimateb...;f=1;t=000645#...
Thank you for the perspective.
Upthread, you wrote:
I believe
there were ICA members who questioned the payments at the time and who
have been harassed for wanting the payments recorded and made in the
correct manner. If you need a refresher on that issue, I can help with
documentation.
Were these empty words?
And a brief shout out to Lafferty's sources, who know a thing or two
about personal inurement themselves ;-)
1. Didn't the ICA Treasurer (a partner at a major national CPA firm)
put the Muradian/Panner documentation together at an ICA Board
meeting, some months after I was gone? Did anyone show up to examine
said documentation? Hmm.
2. Re the CL matter not previously referenced on this forum AFAIK
(pardon the obliqueness): did you tell Lafferty that the party in
question has an *open* wireless IP address? Hmm again, postings by
Fake Party in Question (FPIQ) would be convenient for framing. Of
course, perhaps I'm being misled by the party in question; if so, the
civil courts are there if one wishes to seek redress that way. Rumor-
mongering and undermining the constructive work of others isn't the
correct route.
I didn't call up CPS and say that Presidents' Plaza was a cutout
address of convenience. I'm not planning to, either. I recommend
that you cultivate your garden, provide the services you provide well,
grow and prosper. Or you can continue backstabbing and risk reaping
the potential consequences.