On Mar 22, 8:56 pm, Brian Lafferty wrote:

What consenting adults choose to do which is not illegal, is none of
anyone's business--especially yours. It's a good thing you're not in
college today--damn, those parties are better than anything I
experienced in the 60s.

Prostitution, group sex, adultery, etc... are considered illegal in
some law. The idea of the Freedom League was to lobby for changes to
the law. Anyhow, Sam Sloan doesn't need to please me or anyone else
not fully in chess. However my question asks, whether or not someone
who believes what the Sexual Freedom League advocates, would be
someone a Chess Federation would want as an executive. Again, should
a former president of the Sexual Freedom League be an executive in
chess? Is your answer yes to that?

- Rich