On Mar 25, 8:05 pm, wrote:

The key term "here" clearly specified that
what was being discussed was the exact
paragraph posted here in rgc at the top of
this thread -- not the book. LOL!


I will add that I do not even have the
book which is imagined by TK to be
what I was discussing above. I did at
one time, long, long ago, but like all
books by GM Fine, I distanced my-
self from them upon learning of the
man's Freudian psychological issues.
;P


What an ignorant yet arrogant fool you are, Greg. Larry Parr looks
like William F. Buckley compared to you.


Was WFB a psychotic liar, too? I'm
wondering why he is being dragged into
such a comparison as this. To my mind,
Larry Parr is best compared, not to WFB
or GK, but to the famous chess player
who imagined himself plagued by flies--
at least in common anecdotes. Both
were good chess players, and both quite
batty. The other fellow you mentioned is
perhaps comparable to Max Euwe-- a
boring player who is largely forgotten; of
course, ME was somewhat stronger.


Now I may go to Wikipedia just to try
and figure out why WFB was dragged into
a simple discussion of our topmost post.
I expect to find that it's merely a red
herring, as Mr. TK has grave difficulties in
admitting his many flubs; as we know, he
can't even set the pieces up right before
whipping off an analysis (of the wrong
position).


-- help bot