On Mar 27, 6:23*am, Brian Lafferty wrote:
Rob wrote:
On Mar 26, 8:28 pm, Brian Lafferty wrote:
Rob wrote:
On Mar 26, 4:00 pm, Brian Lafferty wrote:
What Truong did was illegal and may well have affected the election--not
just for Sloan but for other candidates. *And then we have the hypocrisy
of Truong/Polgar claiming the high road in the election when they are
really two of the dirtiest chess politicians who have ever lived.
Brian,
*You do not know what anyone has or has not done. You should use more
*care in your phrasing. Liability for your words may prove painful
*otherwise.
I tried to clear it up for you. YOU and others are conducting a trial
right now in public. Understand now?
Rob, try real hard to follow this. *Number one above is a question asked
precisely because I don't know what the poster has done and would like
to see support for his assertion. Your second sentence is nonsensical..
Brian,
Read #2
You might like someone to give you something for free, but wishing and
getting are not one in the same now are they?
As for who is acceptable and who isn't, when I discussed the prospects
of doing a chess-poker hybrid tournament on television, in order to
get chess on TV, I had people telling me the reputation of the U.S
Chess Federation, and their attempt to deal with minors, would make
that not a good idea.
As is evidenced by Sloans own webpages and the quality of content in
writing from many of his supporters online.
It seems to me that the USCF has been and is promoting scholastic events
all the time. *Give us the specifics of who told you it "would not be a
good idea."
Brian,
Why would anyone share any evidence with you? Conduct your own survey
if so inclined.
Evidence? *This isn't a trial, Rob. *Now again, pay attention and try
real hard to follow this. *The poster made a bald assertion that he has
now been asked to support with facts so that we can determine if what he
represents is true or not.
God Brian! Take your meds. You are requesting the evidence that
supports his assertion that others advised him that doing business
with the USCF wouldn't be wise. Duh!
Rob
Rob
- Rich- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You lose, Rob.

You're lost Brian.

Whatever you say, Rob.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What ever you say, Brian.