how chess book can mess with mind
"help bot" wrote in message
...
On Mar 28, 11:45 am, "Chess One" wrote:
**The Master Phil-Sama.
I had a Mr. Mopperhead look at the headers
of that post, and after careful analysis it was
determined that since all the Fake Sanny
postings were made from Vermont, it was
either nearly-an-IMnes or Tyler Kingstone who
was responsible.
A common mistake. Tyler, you see is a Californian and besides,
lives in a part of the state where you can see New York State,
which real Vermonters avoid having to see.
I told Mr. Mopperhead that I
happened to know for a fact that neither of
those two were responsible types, but he said
I needed some "headers" as proof.
A soccer term?
IMO, it would be a simple matter to construct
a question to determine which Vermontian was
the culprit: a spelling question perhaps, or a
test to see if the Fake Sanny would mindlessly
ape Larry Parr, if given half a chance. But Mr.
Mopperhead is in charge of the investigation,
and he insists on "headers" and IP addresses
and whatnot. Well, he does have a point; what
if "Robber" Mitchell were to spoof nearly-an-
IMnes' IP address? Surely, he too would miss
the spelling question, giving a false-positive
and implicating the wrong man.
That's true. He can't spell worth a shirt.
But what Mr. Mopperhead doesn't know is
that I have devised a very simple test for this;
it's a chess problem that nearly-an-IMnes can
solve (using his Rybka program) easily, but
which Rob "da robber" Mitchell would fail,
hanging a piece (as usual).
Sadly, Rybka is in the dog-house and I haven't used it since Christmas.
Currently I am using EPD2Diag. Which has a horsey header, or icon,
whereas Rybka has a King& Rook combo.
Okay-- maybe I
need to just accept the fact that Mr. Mopper-
head was put in charge, not me. It's /his/
investigation, not mine.
Mr. Mopperhead was never put in charge of anything that I know of*
Didn't he rather take it on himself as a helpful volunteer to, after his
work
was questioned by Mr. Truong, investigate as a complete cooincidence,
and not to do with his business relationship with Mr. Truong?
*[laugh] that is, USCF have been asked who authorised Mr. M's
investigation and (a) forgot to answer the question or (b) said it was
a secret that lawyers told them not to answer, becaus (c) if they did ...
gulp
PI private I Services
I guess I'll just wait
until the real experts do their thing;
meanwhile, I can just sit here, reading about
the many slave-children of John Adams and
George Washington... .
-- help bot
|