In message
,
Sanny writes
A game with Rybka.

Easy Level vs Rybka, where Rybka won in just 9 Moves by sacrificing a
Knight.

Game Played between sanjay11 and easy at GetClub.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Rybka: (White)
Easy: (Black)
Game Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?...913&game=Chess
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

White -- Black
(Rybka) -- (Easy)

1. e2-e4{172} e7-e6{0}
2. d2-d4{74} d7-d5{0}
3. Nb1-c3{12} d5-e4{0}
4. Nc3-e4{14} Bc8-d7{0}
5. Bf1-d3{16} Bf8-e7{38}
6. Ng1-f3{12} f7-f5{26}
7. Nf3-e5{24} f5-e4{46}
8. Bd3-e4{14} Nb8-c6{32}
9. Qd1-h5{16} g7-g6{24}

More like worlds worst game by Getclub against Rybka.

One can quibble about the minor errors early in the game, but the
catastrophic materialistic grab 7. .... fxN only starts the slide.

But the utterly ineffectual Nc6 beggars belief and is terminal.

Almost anything with a half decent look ahead would see that Qh5+ is
extremely scary. Although its dire consequences might be just beyond
GetClubs event horizon. But it shouldn't be - singular extensions should
get it because there are forced moves.

Rybka Sacrificed its Knight to win the game.

I'd hazard a guess that the King protection logic is flawed, and there
is no special case quiescence search for near mate situations. It may be
relevant that one of the mating continuations can include a Q sacrifice.

Regards.
--
Martin Brown

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com