On Apr 4, 4:22 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 4, 4:55 pm, samsloan wrote:



On Apr 4, 3:43 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

computer chess eliminated from this message.

"samsloan" wrote in message

...

Today, Susan launched into her usual rant of late. What I find
interesting is that today Susan complained that Jerry Hanken had
leaked confidential information to me and I in turned had used that
confidential information in my opposition to her attorney's motion to
dismiss.

However, I am unaware of any confidential information, either in what
Jerry Hanken leaked to me

Ah! So Jerry Hanken did leak something to you?

Apart from the most obvious questions of what that was, the other
equally
obvious question was how come Hanken was involved at all, and who
'involved'
him? )

Phil Innes

I am now aware of Jerry Hanken leaking anything to me, confidential or
otherwise.

Hmmm, I think Sam meant to type "not" instead of "now," but the
latter may be more accurate. Freudian slip?

Freudian slut. Besides he slutted twice in the same message.

PI

Thank you. Right. I am not aware (not "now aware").

Point is, many USCF members call me and no doubt call the opposing
sides trying to bring about a settlement of this suit. What is wrong
with that? It should be encouraged. However, as long as Truong and
Polgar remain on the board there seems to be no chance that an
agreement can be reached.

Keep your sluts to yourself. You have your sluts. I have mine.

Sam Sloan