"samsloan" wrote in message
...
The statement by Phil Innes that Joel Channing resigned on April 4 is
still on his blog, although it seems not to be true.

Sam Sloan in 2 dozen words gets 3 things wrong. It is not a 'blog', neither
is it mine, nor is it unseemly. Neither does he state anything right in
order to support his own view, or how it 'seems' to him.

If Mr Channing has been induced to 'unresign', or 'not continue' with his
resignation, or other such jolly euphemisms which revert the situation, then
that will 'seem' as if was wrong.

Meanwhile Rome is not burning but definitely smoldering with a continuation
of ineffective financial plans - and that again is a difference between Mr.
Sloan and myself, since it really will not matter who resigned and who
stayed if the very board table sat around goes up in the smoke.

And there is plenty of smoke!

Phil Innes

http://www.chessville.com/Editorials...rrot/Index.htm

Sam Sloan