On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:28:34 -0400, "Chess One"
wrote:


Normally, I'd agree with you, but given Truong and Polgar's
involvement with scholastic chess, it's probably something that
parents of prospective clients should evaluate.

I would say that comment is actionable. Of course, Mike Murray may not know
the truth, and I say the same to him as some moments before, I said to Brian
Lafferty.

"Actionable"? You would say? The comment that a parent should
*evaluate* the published discussion concerning a guardian ad litem
report before entrusting their child to one of the subjects of the
report -- this is "actionable" ?

Phil, you are truly an ignorant blowhard.

You and Rob toss around legal terminology with all the authority of
children with blocks.