wrote:
Seriously for once:

A bit more than 1 1/2 years ago, I noted veiled threats to said
children (identifying their school) posted to the P forum in the
context of a discussion of S. The poster identified himself as one
A----- M-----, who at that time (as can be confirmed via readily-
available sources independent of yours truly), was a correspondent of
S-----.

http://tinyurl.com/5gp7pz

(My comments allude to material deleted on both the blog and
Wikipedia.)

I say this simply to note that IMO, the threats were not imaginary.


Thanks for the context Bill.

However, linkage to Bill Goichberg seems ludicrous on its face.

It caused me to question. Does libel mean anything anymore?

I would appreciate it if *all* parties would omit the children from
the discussion going forward.

This is wise. Yet the moderator left it in on Susan's blog...
--

Cordially,
Rev. J.D. Walker