Unconstructively crossposted from the Open Forum
***
Blogger Bill Brock said...
Re the 6:05 CDT post:
obvious man said...
"Goichberg is so hated on this forum. Did he have anything to do
with the controversial move to Crossville? Did he hire friends and
family to USCF positions? Was he responsible for holding a national
tournament in Oklahoma? What, exactly, did he do to earn him vitriol?"
Goichberg decided on a personal crusade to destroy Susan Polgar
through his actions against her and her chldren as President of USCF.
As a result of this, Goichberg has earned the scorn and curses of
thousands of Susan Polgar fans from around the world.
There will be parties of celebration when Goichberg is out of
power. He has no right to soil the reputation of GM Polgar!
Pass it on!
Saturday, April 12, 2008 6:05:00 PM CDT
"[A]nd her children"? Not a credible claim.
If you were in the habit of signing your name, Obvious Man, you
would not be experiencing your current problems.
Saturday, April 12, 2008 10:38:00 PM CDT
***
Anonymous most obvious man said...
""[A]nd her children"? Not a credible claim.
If you were in the habit of signing your name, Obvious Man, you
would not be experiencing your current problems."
Again, you mistake me for someone else. On the Internet, everyone
is a dog. As we all know, dogs have a good sense of smell and I smell
a dirty rat-like Laugherty attack.
You guys work together with Goich-nerd and Sloani to attack
innocent people. Just read Sloanis reply to the judge. It mentions not
only personal information leak to Sloani, but it attacks Susan's
children! Laugherty, you and Sloani are evil human beings! How can you
stand yourselves?
***
Saturday, April 12, 2008 11:36:00 PM CDT
Blogger Bill Brock said...
I believe my attitude towards Sloan may be on record somewhere,
most obvious man.
The opinion that Sloan has in the past advanced Goichberg's
interests is not exactly an uncommon one: I have expressed it myself.
Assuming arguendo that all you say is correct, to ascribe a
*particular vile act* by Sloan to Goichberg would seem unjustified.
Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:13:00 AM CDT
***
Blogger Bill Brock said...
Offered merely as a curiosity. Use Acrobat search to find the
cited passage....
http://tinyurl.com/5p6mgm
THE EVOLUTION OF CRAYFISHES OF THE
GENUS ORCONECTES SECTION LIMOSUS
"The section of the limosus stock inhabitating the Pliocene
Cincinnati River and the Cincinnati Uplands was forced westward
through sluiceways nicked into the Knobstone scarp by the Muscatatuck
River. After surviving in the unglaciated re-entrant of southern
Indiana, the population spread eastward in post-Kansan times to
occupy the gently sloping west-facing flank of the Niagaran scarp in
southeastern Indiana. The species probably did not occupy a very wide
area for the Muscatatuck drainage was bounded on the east and south by
the unbeveled lip of the Niagaran limestones. Had the species reached
Laugherty Creek or the
Ohio River, O. sloani would be represented today in the crayfish fauna
of Kentucky."