"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:LaTLj.43$HJ1.9@trndny01...

Laugherty refuses to acknowledge that the judge dismissed and THREW OUT
the charge he repeats. He says he does not understand the phrase.

Did the judge now? Got a copy of the decision and order of "dismissal?"
If you don't have the order, tell us when it was filed with the court
clerk. Prove to us that there was a "dismissal."

Lafferty - you evade your understanding of what a charge 'thrown out' means,
as if the term was unknown or unusual. Now you want me to do your work for
you, and 'prove' something to an abusenik!

You have raised this issue, let you be aware that it is a contested one, and
some due diligence is necessary when casting aspersions, eh?

I do not intend to prove anything to you, since your investigation is
patently insincere, and because I think 'answering' such material as you
request will make no difference to your own orientation whatever, and
indeed, I think people's children might be left out of this proxy fight.

My challenge was to you - that you pretend you cannot understand 'threw out'
to mean 'dismissal' even though I cited the context as much as it needs be
displayed in public. That you should continue to pretend not to understand
it requires no special recommendation of mine of your sincerity to the
public here.

Phil Innes