"EZoto" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:46:43 GMT, Brian Lafferty
wrote:

Wrong. The election was not fair given the FSS posts. We'll see what
the courts eventually decide.

And lets say the courts decide. What makes you think with the
behavoir shown here from you clowns would anyone want you guys in
office. If the courts decide then so be it. But there is no way
anyone would want you clowns either. Your behavoir as former elected
officials is reprehensible.

But at least Lafferty subscribes to the rule of law in his comment above -
and if indeed he is sincere in that, then let him not agitate further
outside that system of properly audited evidences.

The trouble with answering questions from a clacque of interrogators, is
that nothing ever seems to depend on it. Thereby, such 'questions' seem
never any more than opportunies to cast aspersions. No one, for example, has
said what they would resolve if the questions were answered - whether they
would apologise, stop casting negative aspersions onto others in public,
and, as at the top, allow the courts to do their properly constituted
business of determining what is what.

There's the rub!

Instead of declaring for themselves what /depends/ on any answer, instead we
read here newer, more horrifying crimes of the suspected perps -
alternately, the answers are not understood, or the answerer is rubbished,
since the interrogators don't like the answers.

This is literally to say that patently nothing depends on any answer to a
question, and the questioners take no responsibility for their own actions
in proposing them. That is, they are demonstrated to be nothing more than
feckless accusations, on which depends nothing.

Phil Innes

EZoto