by RoadRunner on Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:19 pm


John thank you for giving me the last word. I guess that is your
admission that you are wrong here. Or certainly that you refuse to
listen to what I have to say.

1) Let me ask you to imagine a big successful company like Microsoft.
That is certainly successful. Imagine further that: Now they have a
magazine called Microsoft Magazine that goes out to all the employees of
the company and all investors in the stock. This magazine has writers
who openly severely criticize the Board of Directors of Microsoft. The
employee of Microsoft who is the Editor of the magazine informs Bill
Gates that he has to pay this writer money for his articles because
Hanken says the writer has freedom of speech. How long do you imagine it
will take for the editor to get his severance check from the company. Do
you think the new editor will hire this same writer because of freedom
of speech.

Sam Sloan is not a member of the EB of USCF. He is simply a member of
the USCF.

2) I support Free Speech and all of its Constitutional guarantees. This
is not a Free Speech issue. Stop trying to change the topic.

3) Hanken and Hillary have 2 legs each. Together they have 4. Nice try
to become a 4 legged animal. I have no idea what this red herring has to
do with the discussion. Are you trying to say you are prejudiced?

I will leave off with one statement. I have run a few successful
companies. If you and Hanken worked for me you would be fired
immediately in the middle of the day and receive a severance check
immedately and escorted to the door never to return. I would never put
up with your insolence.

in�so�lence �noun
1. contemptuously rude or impertinent behavior or speech.
2. the quality or condition of being insolent.

RoadRunner

__________________________________________________ __________

My response to that clucking fowl, Roadrunner, was pulled after
several hours, so I'm re-posting it here.
__________________________________________________ __________



1) No, I don't agree that I am wrong. I do plan not to listen to you
in future, since you've proven yourself to be utterly deluded and
impervious to reason.

2) I suggest that you a) learn to spell and b) improve your reading
habits to that you can recognize a literary allusion when it bites
you.

3) Fortunately, I don't work for you, and neither does anyone at the
USCF. Why don't you gut that red herring and fry it for dinner? If you
dislike insolence, then perhaps you should avoid debating with persons
over whom you have no power.