Mike Murray wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:20:13 -0400, "Chess One"
wrote:

I was on a state board which has to do with the welfare of children, the
state's preparedness over the next 10 years, and especially those in
trouble ho actually require temporary shelter of all kinds, physical, diversion,
legal &c.

Care to list any particulars ?

Murray, as elsewhere, you neglect to say what depends on your knowing
anything -... Like the
fatuous Kennedy, more information makes you more confused, more suspicious!

Well, certainly in your case, Phil, when you supply "more information"
about your various credentials, it tends to make me "more suspicious".
There's a reason for this, Phil, and that reason is you've tend to lie
about your credentials.

Therefore, when you tend to cite your past experiences, honors,
credentials, triumphs, whatever, in order to lend your opinions some
authority, you'd better be ready to mention particulars. Otherwise,
we tend to put your brags and boasts in the same category as your
well-known claim to be almost an IM with a rating of 2450.

Try and life your own life, man! Get out of everyone else's!

It was you, Phil, who brought up your supposed service on a state
board.

Now, I'm not saying that you didn't serve on some state board. But
you didn't mention the facets of your service that might be relevant.
For example, when (forty years ago?), in what capacity (addressing
envelopes? janitor?), where (in this country? what state?), what this
state board actually DID (lots of things have "to do with the welfare
of children" -- a reform school, for example).

Earlier, you made some rather ignorant statements which led some of us
to conclude you had little or no understanding of what a guardian ad
litem might do, and we called you on it.

In response, you strutted out a claim about past service on some state
board "concerned with the welfare of children", as if this should
demonstrate the absurdity of questioning your lack of knowledge.

Sorry, Phil, it just don't cut it. Not with your reputation as a
bluffer. We want to see the cards.



Almost sounds like the rap on Phil's friend Paul Truong. We're still
waiting to see Truong's business cards from all those companies he
turned around and the Fortune 500 companies he allegedly worked for.

Birds of a feather do flock together.