On Apr 14, 11:37 am, "David Kane" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Apr 14, 1:25 am, The Historian wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:57 pm, "David Kane" wrote:

"The Historian" wrote in message

...

On Apr 12, 11:14 pm, wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:10 pm, wrote:

On Apr 12, 10:47 pm, The Historian
wrote:

Not surprising. Gotta build up sympathy for Susie.

The Christian misconstrues the atheist's pure motives.

It is true that I once had a great deal of sympathy for her.

If you want to do something constructive (for a change of pace), write
to and tell him to reissue the 1976 Papp /
NY Shakespeare production of Threepenny.

The irony of Bill Brock telling anyone else to "be constructive" is
mind-boggling.

Do explain.

I feel perhaps it might be better to have Mr. Brock's posts explain my
remark. Read through a representative sample of them, and tell me what
is "constructive" about any of them. Keep in mind "constructive"
doesn't mean "agrees with my thoughts on the subject" or "good
humored" or "civil" or "literate."

All of us would do well to channel our constructive impulses to a
venue other than this one.

My reason for asking is that I have seen little in his posts that
would suggest that he is incapable of being constructive. Ok, he is
a tad obsessed with Mr. Sloan, which can't be good, but it
doesn't seem to have reached a crippling level. We all have our
less-than-perfectly-healthy obsessions, after all.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Ballad-of-.../dp/B0012P9SGY