April 15th 08, 01:50 PM
posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
|
|
|
Susan Polgar wants Jerry Hanken Fired
Chess One wrote:
"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
...
Mike Murray wrote:
The term 'nut' seems relatively fitting to describe someone
unqualified to analyze the "direct evidence" but who prattles
endlessly about the results of his analysis. Maybe 'crank' or
'crackpot' would be slightly better.
You're not qualified to do armchair textual analysis of deliberately
forged material, Phil, and neither am I.
That's OK, because he never actually did the analysis. If he had,
he would have beennable to produce the file he started with and the
statistics he derived from it.
The Sleeze Core continue to put other people down because they DID look at
available evidence.
 )
The Sleeze Core didn't look, since it might disturb them.
Now the Sleezies declare those who DID look owe them something,
OR
that they KNOW other people also didn't look either,
OR
that other people are unqualified to look.
That is the level of the prosecutions case. I think I can rest mine here.
----------
Nothing disturbs their habit, which is to rubbish other people whether they
did or did not do anything!~
The don't look at actual evidence and display their own sense of it.
They don't care to distinguish accusation from what has been investigated
and found unwarranted by a court.
All they care for is putting others down since they think that impresses
people other than themselves.
And they don't know that is untrue.
I think there is nothing left to discuss with this bunch of out-and-out
abuseniks, whose 'attention' to any matter at hand is shown to be puerile,
by the level of their own writing!
Phil Innes
It must be painful living with a brain as full of **** as yours, Phil.
My condolences.
|