wrote in message
...


This is really well done. I find it amusing that Innes' textual
analysis has seemed to imply that Neil Brennen is the most likely FSS,
and this is satire. However, Neil is the one person for whom we have
seen actual satire of Sam Sloan on a regular basis; it sure doesn't
look like the FSS postings to me! Among other things, like this post,
Neil's satires were attempts (good ones in my opinion) to be clever,
not to be simply repulsive.

Jerry Spinrad

------------

And since you have now truly come out to support the main abusenik of the
newsgroup whose public writings for 5 years are on a certain theme, one you
haven't noticed, so to speak, and while not admitting of course, you could
tell the FSS from the Sloan, Brennan's utterarances are so clear to you.

Why don't you tell people about what you yourself are accused of Jerry - I
wonder if you will find that as amusing? It is poetically apt after all, the
proxy attacks, and here you use Brennan for the same purpose yourself.

Come on! Tell everyone what the board has received recently - and as well as
Hanken I named you, didn't I? Could you state if you had an interest in what
happened? That is publicly decent, ain't it? And my personal mail contains
one post from Hanken who naturally spat and flew, but other mail Jerry! From
people who are disgusted.

You tell them if you want, but its OK if you don't because next week I'm
going to tell everybody.

Phil Innes