wrote in message
...
Although I am violating my policy of not responding to Phil, I have
absolutely no clue what I am supposed to be accused of.

** Of course, not! You are so busy not responding to certain people, you
naturally don't have time to examine what they say, therefore 'have
absolutely no clue'. As a form of tautological argument, its spot on. As a
form of expression, neither does it contain any curiosity or request to know
anything, thus it is inert.

Given the topic of the thread in which Jerry Sprinrad writes, I think a
defining moment has been reached, as indeed for USCF. Phil Innes


Jerry Spinrad