PAUL TRUONG ANSWERS SAM SLOAN IN ANOTHER FORUM
No word can possibly describe you. What I find even more sickening is
there are actually a few derange people who pay attention to your
garbage. There is absolutely no truth to this nonsense. During a child
custody battle, the side which was ruled against made some wild
charges hoping to have some past court decisions relating to the case
reversed. There is not even an ounce of truth to the allegations. A
family court judge made a temporary order while waiting for an
investigation to be done and the order was promptly lifted once the
facts came out.
A thorough investigation was done by child protective services and
they concluded that there was absolutely no truth to the allegations.
In fact, the children clearly stated numerous times to the law
guardian and the representatives from child protective services that
they were told to say this and they would get lots of toys if they do.
They were around 6 and 7 years old at that time. Even the children’s
teacher testified in court that there was absolutely no truth to this
because the children told her what actually happened. Not a single
person collaborated with the person who made these false charges.
ALL CHARGES WERE DROPPED. In fact, the same person who made these
bogus charges agreed to drop the charges. But what do you care about
the truth, right?
In spite of being smeared by this individual repeatedly, Susan has
displayed class and dignity by refusing to say anything negative about
this individual publicly for the sake of her children.
You are a despicable human being for involving innocent children in
your personal and twisted agenda. After knowing the truth, you still
continue to spread your lies. Why don't you do something useful like
go get a job to properly support your family? What's worse is the
entire board majority was told of the facts and they still continue to
allow this kind of deliberate lies to continue to circulate for their
own agenda while the USCF is $200,000 in the hole in this fiscal year.
This is Susan Polgar's response on another forum:
"I am quite appalled by the disgusting tactic displayed by some
posters here. Do you have no shame? How low are you willing to stoop?
My children are currently living happily with my husband and I in
Texas. They are excellent students and they make the honor roll each
semester since they have been here.
If the charges are true, do you honestly think that a judge would
allow my relocation with my family to Texas to happen? CPS did a
thorough investigation of these completely fabricated charges. They
interviewed my children numerous times. They also interviewed their
school teachers, school nurse, doctors, and school principal, etc. Do
you think that CPS would not step in to prevent this if the charges
are true? All the bogus charges were dropped.
And people wonder why so many good people walked away and giving up on
the USCF."
In a message dated 4/22/2008 8:24:03 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
writes:
Texas Justice ??
It is known and the sisters have confessed that Papa Polgar used to
beat them to force them to play chess and study chess and it was
living Hell to live in that home where they were not allowed to go out
and associate and play with other kids their ages. Of course, this is
what made them into great chess players. Otherwise, they would be
working as office secretaries somewhere today.
And now, Susan Polgar is applying to her children the same techniques
that were applied to her, forcing her kids to play chess. Problem is
that her kids are boys who are often not as compliant as girls and the
youngest one does not like chess and has complained to the
authorities.
What Larry Parr is missing is the big Texas case going on right now
where 416 children were taken from their parents and put into foster
care solely and entirely because their families were living in or
associated with a polygamous life style:
Sam Sloan wrote:
Texas Justice ??
It is known and the sisters have confessed that Papa Polgar used to
beat them to force them to play chess and study chess and it was
living Hell to live in that home where they were not allowed to go out
and associate and play with other kids their ages. Of course, this is
what made them into great chess players. Otherwise, they would be
working as office secretaries somewhere today.
And now, Susan Polgar is applying to her children the same techniques
that were applied to her, forcing her kids to play chess. Problem is
that her kids are boys who are often not as compliant as girls and the
youngest one does not like chess and has complained to the
authorities.
What Larry Parr is missing is the big Texas case going on right now
where 416 children were taken from their parents and put into foster
care solely and entirely because their families were living in or
associated with a polygamous life style:
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_8989851
These 416 are in most cases refugees who escaped when a similar
compound was raided along the Arizona Utah border.
It is a funny coincidence that after being faced with child abuse
charges in New York, the Polgars moved to Texas too !!!
In the vast majority of countries and societies of the world polygamy
was practiced and in most cases still is. Here in the US it is not
allowed. Here, we only have girlfriends.
I have been doing research on my family history and I have found three
instances of my ancestors who had an unusually large number of
children.
All of them lived in the 1700s. None of them were related to each
other. None of them were involved in any funny religions. They were
all straight-line Methodists or Presbyterians. Some were preachers.
One of these was Andrew Graham who arrived in America in 1772. He was
married four times. Three of his wives were named Margaret. It is not
known when he married or divorced them, or when they died. He has more
than 7,000 descendants alive today, which may explain why there are so
many people nowadays named Graham.
I have a book out about this:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891072
My research tends to show that most men had no children at all and a
few men had very large numbers of children, some men producing more
than 20 children.
My question is: Would the human race have survived at all and would
any of us be alive today had it not been for those few men who
produced large numbers of children?
The other question is: Some would say that Polgar is guilty of beating
his kids to force them to play chess. Suppose he beat the kids to
force them to learn their math tables or to do their homework or to
practice the piano. Would he still be considered guilty?
Sam Sloan