On Apr 24, 10:19 am, Rob wrote:
On Apr 23, 11:14 pm, help bot wrote:

On Apr 23, 11:43 pm, The Historian
wrote:

You admit to creating the word. Do you recant? Confess .
I admit I believed I originated the term, but I've since come to the
conclusion there were multiple authors of "Trollgar" in various
spellings. Too many folks were using the term. I don't see anything
in the post to recant or confess.
I don't know why so many people keep trying
-- in vain -- to prove Rob Mitchell wrong. It can't
be done, for as we all know, he has never erred.

-- help bot

Thanks "Bot" . I am human and do err. Since you have destroyed me in
chess you can attest to this. But, and it's a big butt, Neil can't
recognize he cannot say he has not attacked Susan and Paul. Has has an
opportunity to be honest. I have offered to admit an error in my
judgement of his attitude towards Paul and Susan if he can prove he
did not attack them. Or , if he says he will no longer attack them. If
he will do that I will do what I said I will do. But, and it's a big
butt, I will not clear Neil until he admits and recants his guilt.
Rob which-Mitch,Lex Mitchell

Posted April 23rd:

"I do not have a desire to "attack" Ms. Polgar, Mr. Truong, or Mr. P
Innes. Nor do I consider myself to have done so. We await you
withdrawing your 'charges' and your admission of error.

Neil the Chess Cafe writer"

Still waiting for Rob Mitchell to admit error.