On Apr 24, 11:55 am, Rob wrote:

Let me make this REALLY easy for you :

I, Neil Brennen, do not have a desire to "attack" Ms. Polgar, Mr.
Truong, or Mr. Phil
Innes. I admit to and recant my use or variation of the term
"Trollgar"


Wait a second. How does Mr. Phil Innes enter into it?
(Is *he* the real FSS?)

I think maybe the PT apologists are getting themselves
even more confused than usual. The accusation did not
involve nearly-IMnes at all; it stated that ChessCafe
writers were beating up on the dynamic duo (i.e. SP/PT).
Now, if that was mistaken, it seems that dragging a
famous nearly-an-IM into it is mere desperation. (Why
not also "tack on" a requirement to smell Sam Sloan's
underarms, just to be sure?)


Well, it looks as though somebody is not going to
admit his error, no matter what the facts might be.


-- help bot