wrote in message
...
On Apr 24, 12:02 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 24, 6:53 am, "Chess One" wrote:

Dear Jerry Spinrad,

Thank you for your replies. I think perhaps you accept that not everything
was or is yet quite in the open here, but your attention to what is and
what
is not so apparent is possibly now incremented by materials not previously
known to yourself.

Yes. It is interesting, needs some serious evaluation, and suggests a
direction of inquiry I had no inkling of.

** Very good Jerry. Let us now park this conversation, pending
developments...

I still believe that it is
important for Paul to make a legally binding declaration of innocence,
and make this public. If he is innocent, it would seem to be
enormously in his self-interest, and would oppose the claims that he
refused to cooperate in such a statement with a positive step rather
than a counter-accusation.

** To conclude on it? P'raps. Though I am of another mind, it is not my
call: That will be his choice, weighing the one thing 'gainst the other.

Jerry Spinrad

Consequently some indirection was indicated.

Zrávstvuite! Phil Innes

Hae nugae in seria ducent mala: consilio et animis non impetu et
prudentia.

** Horace is quite often, cool, no? Though only half that is his. The
balance of it is indeed, in the balance.

Cordially, Phil Innes