On Apr 30, 5:28 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

These are no doubt phrases understood where you are. But my question to you
is what you want? Not what some people want. Maybe you get to it in this
message?


You keep tossing out assertions, and when I
point out that you are mistaken, giving specific
examples in support, you always change the
subject so you can pretend that you were not
debunked. Where does that get *you*?


As for *me*, here are my requests:

1) Organizer to provide PB&J sandwiches either before,
after, or during play.

2) Mr. Sloan must bathe, wear deodorant, that sort of
thing. I will do the same; in fact, if I lose to SS, I may
react by taking cold showers and slapping myself
repeatedly.

3) First to win six, draws not counting. If the score
is tied at 5-5, both players get a free bag of Doritos.



I pass on something so vague and anodyne I don't know what it is.


Blah, blah, blah! If you have nothing to say, why
don't you go somewhere else and play chess or
something?

Nobody here in rgc writes more vague jabber than
you do. Sometimes I wonder if you are being paid
*by the word*... .


Still no chessic subject matter...


I didn't want to go beyond your depth. Why don't
you consider getting a *real* job? All this following
LP around like a lost puppy, then having RM tag
along behind you-- that's not what real men do; it's
for kiddies.

I already gave you a challenge: write an op/ed
piece in which you express your own thinking, not
parrot LE, RK, LP or anybody else. Unchain your
mind from *their* agendas.


-- help bot