On Apr 30, 8:09 am, "Chess One" wrote:

However, most voters know little or nothing about this. Many voted
just on the basis of campaign statements published in Chess Life. They
would hardly be expected to know about the serious problems with
everything involving Susan Polgar going back for the past 23 years.

Or... even your own problems, which go back even further?


That's age discrimination! Definitely not politically
correct.


They would not know that the problems Polgar has been creating here
are almost identical to the problems she created back in Hungary
before she got here.


Interesting... S. Polgar has learned nothing in all
those many years? Not even from Paul Truong?


Pushing the limits of the game to involve more players, eliminating
gender-bias from the inside, by actually encouraging self esteem in young
women, as if they were people too?


Ridiculous. You need to pick up a copy of
Cosmopolitan, and take a good, hard look at the
cover (any issue will do). The message is quite
clearly that women are merely sex objects... and
who is it that buys those magazines, anyway?
(Not me; I prefer GQ and The Economist.)


People are terrified that the precious balance of the status quo will be
upset, that new criteria will apply, and a necessary transparency


Guffaw! Ha ha, good one... Susan Polgar is a
"promoter of transparency", har har.

I think Mr. Sloan has some very serious issues
with Susan Polgar, if you know what I mean. PT
is a thorn-chick in his backside, and he seems
frustrated that he cannot use his apparata-chick
on Suzsa-chick. Maybe SS needs to just get
over it? Move on with his life... .


-- help bot