On Apr 30, 8:38 am, samsloan wrote:

Do you feel that by posting thousands of obscene and pornographic
messages from "The Fake Sam Sloan"


Formerly, Mr. Sloan "identified" Paul Truong as
the offender; now it seems he has changed his
mind on a whim.


and by posting similar obscene
messages on her own blog athttp://www.susanpolgar.blogspot.com,
Susan Polgar has been "eliminating gender-bias from the inside". Do
you feel that her personal attacks on rival female chess grandmasters
has helped by "actually encouraging self esteem in young women"?


Mr. Sloan got something right: Susan Polgar
has a long history of attacking her rivals. I got
the impression that she's stuck on herself.


If you have such strong opinions on this subject, why do not you
actually come up with some money and join the USCF? Why is it that her
biggest supporters and our biggest critics are non-members such as
Phil Innes, Rob Mitchell and Taylor Kingston? If you are so interested
in the welfare of the USCF (instead of trying to destroy it which is
what you seem to be trying to do) why not join our organization?


Let me take a stab at answering this one: those
guys may not like the way the USCF publishes
"ridiculously deflated numbers" as if they were
supposed to reflect their real, peak strengths at
chess. For instance, they have Dr. IMnes down
as a mere Expert; and Taylor Kingston as what,
a Class A or B player? Worst of all, they don't
even have any rating at all for Rob "da robber"
Mitchell! Now, what sort of organization is it
that conspires to artificially skew the ratings of
such greats? If you really want them to join,
first you're gonna hafta "fix" that broken rating
system.


-- help bot