BRAIN, you offer up your wit, and your borrowed cynicism in another's words
lacking even your own phrasing, except those anal references truly your own
which you now snip away as if you could escape their implication!
R
O
F
L
!
The BRIAN say's nothing to any issue it raises beyond its own invective.
That means the BRAIN is bust, even in its last stand, a public newsgroup.
And that is pathetic!
Since the BRAIN is/are a sort of leader of a pack, and what it professes is
magnificently unable to make any response thereon, it is maybe the last
element to appreciate its own plight.
Everyone here can witness your vacuity and your ill will, your completely
debauched and illogical obsessional postings on one topic, which you are
unable to discuss with any other human being whomever, who has even the
slightest demurrer. The BRAIN continues to protest its special understanding
of things as autodidact to those who like that sort of stuff.
I already made my case, 3 times on 3 issues, to which you responded nothing
of substance. That means you are bust, BRAIN, it means you are as a
Numbskull, an unresponsive ranter on this, and every forum - and your
appreciation of things is rejected by every contact you have made.
It cannot recommend you to broader subjects, nor any /assignatus utitur jure
actoris/ which you will understand, but I translate for others to mean that
you represent not the slightest principal of law. And law, I remind you, is
the /lowest/ social denominator in any culture.
Language too hard to understand, Judge?
That you neglect to mention these things is merely that you may continue to
protest to whom? Who actually rides forth with the BRAIN?
Nihil ex nihilo, quod non opus est, asse carum est.
Phil Innes
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:qpKSj.12$JF1.6@trndny06...
Chess One wrote:
--and since you ain't subtle, that means I am not interested, darling--
Geddit?
Phil Innes
Not interested. Interesting. Is that why you respond with so much sound
and fury meaning little or nothing? :-)