On May 6, 3:37*pm, help bot wrote:
On May 6, 11:10 am, wrote:

* Even allowing, for the sake of argument, Bronstein's interpretation
of 1948-51, I don't see anything unethical in this. However, what the
Spanish writers seem to be implying, or believe that Bronstein is
implying, is that Botvinnik used his position and connections to gain
preferential access to others' games

* This "interpretation" escapes me; I cannot read
Spanish,

Then you might be well advised to avoid commenting from ignorance.
Not that that has deterred you in the past.

* This "question" would seem to apply to *all* of
the Russian world champions; why then is Mr.
Botvinnik being singled out here?

It's quite simple. The link given in the original post deals with
Botvinnik, therefore my comments deal with Botvinnik.