5. c4-b5{572} Bf8-d6{1506}

Words fail me. It is hard to imagine how any half decent evaluation
function can see this as a good move even at ply 1. Blocking in your own
QP with a bishop is doing whites job for him.

This move was made as it want to take out the Bishop and do Chastling.
I have given points for piece development and chastling. Bishop if
goes out at 5..... Bf8-e7 Then it would have played d6 and Blocked the
Bishop and it has to go back to f8.


Bd6 is Shredders 15th ranked choice of 26 moves so pick a move at random
and you have better than even chances of improving Getclubs play here.

5. ... d6 and black is pretty well on track for a strong game.
5. ... e4 looks interesting too (not sure I would risk it).

6. e2-e4{104} Nf6-e4{1978}

And now the final coup de grace. Suicide chess anyone ???

No it gives 2 points for killing 2 Center pawns and other 1 point for
white King Comming out unprotected. and Look at White position its
none of the pieces is developed.

Would do at a pinch. Otherwise engine annotation ignores the illegal
moves and the game after a promotion is complete gibberish.

Humans would also like to have castles shown as O-O not Ke1-g2 and
captures shown with the standard "x" capture notation Nf6xe4 not Nf6-e4
and mark checks with +.

Yes, I will see if that can be corrected. It is very difficult to
modify the code as changing one line of code brings new Bugs and then
a week is wasted in correcting the Bugs.

Its like when we fly Kites. When the threads messup how difficult it
is to correct the jumbeled threads.

This Program is so large that if I have to read whole program line by
line, it will take me full day. So its very difficult to go through
all the codes and correct them.

Bye
Sanny