On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:58:36 -0700 (PDT), The Historian
wrote:


Phil's prattle about QC vis-a-vis titles is ironic, given his aid,
comfort and general flackery in favor of questionable claims by one
well known USCF board member.

Leaving aside his own well-known claims to being "nearly an IM", of
course, and his alleged 2450 rating.

It would have been hard to QC that claim if any posts contradicting it
were instantly deleted, wouldn't it?