The real difficulty about identifying the FSS was ever to compare the
thousands of anon messages with known diction of various writers,
their specific emphasis and even quantitative analysis of varies words
and terms used. But the FSS was careful! Never writing too much,
sometimes borrowing speech from others, and staying within a
relatively small range of words.

So... some time ago the thought was to go-fish, and by analysis
compare voluntary emotive expressions here, with the Anonymous
expressions of the FSS.

The process was sometimes hilarious, but over 2 years there were lots
of bites at Columbo's heels

Now that the matter is closed, or almost so, those who have looked on
while I fished, may have some ideas of their own. Naturally those will
not be presenting in this forum, but to all those who went after
everything dangled in front of them, thanks for playing.

Cordially, Phil "Inspector Columbo" Innes