It's irrelevant if it's discussed or not. You are not the court, so when you
bring the verdict, the case is over. Well, Mr. Khariton sentence was
correct:
At www.chesscafe.com Edward Winter accused Kasparov of plagiarism and
cited some examples from his new book.

Jerzy wrote:
I don`t know whether it`s a milestone or not but for sure it`s worth
buying
and reading

That's your right. I don't read every mail of some scribomen from this
newsgroup, so I'll not buy these books. By the way, I think that books of
the famous writer Dmitrije Bjelica, titled "The kings of the chess" (13.
books, ended with Kasparov) are unparalleled better that that trilogy. These
evaluations of some WCC which Kasparov signalized in his interview are
enough for me. Who can endure his swank?! Moreover, I don't think that
Kasparov's mother is better expert of chess history and development of the
chess than me. So, I don't need these books.

Regards,
Goran Tomic