Everything else you say, fine, but to say "are unparalleled better than that
trilogy" when you haven`t even read it, is a statement completely devoid of
logic or reasoning. It`s impossible to make meaningful judgements on a book
you haven`t read. They may suck, but making comparisons involving something
you haven`t even read (and hasn`t even been finished yet) is not
realistically possible here.

Everything else you say is opinion, but trying to make value comparisons
involving something not even written yet, much less read by you, is
completely nonsensical.

- Joshua B. Lilly




"tomic" wrote in message
...

That's your right. I don't read every mail of some scribomen from this
newsgroup, so I'll not buy these books. By the way, I think that books of
the famous writer Dmitrije Bjelica, titled "The kings of the chess" (13.
books, ended with Kasparov) are unparalleled better that that trilogy.
These
evaluations of some WCC which Kasparov signalized in his interview are
enough for me. Who can endure his swank?! Moreover, I don't think that
Kasparov's mother is better expert of chess history and development of the
chess than me. So, I don't need these books.

Regards,
Goran Tomic