On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:28:21 GMT, "Matt Nemmers"
wrote:

"Michael Ferguson" wrote in message
.. .

Yes -- I voted for Sam. He is no surely worse than the rest of those
bunglers. At least I can count on Sam to be informed before he makes a
decision, and not just spout off random nonsense like 99% of this
newsgroup's participants.



-- mcf


I guess you're new 'round these parts.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2E351555

Check that out before you start talking about Sloan being "informed before
he makes a decision" and how he doesn't "just spout off random nonsense."

I read the link. Sam was just reporting something he had heard
elsewhere; there was no "decision", except to unknowingly relay the
incorrect information. Anyone could fall for something like this.

Guess maybe YOU should've been a little more informed before you cast your
vote. (Not that you aren't entitled...)

I've been reading this newsgroup long enough to know that 99% of the
denizens here are a bunch of crack-smocking lunatics. Sam may be
insane in his own way, but at least he has good writing skills and can
reason clearly. This is much more than I can say for the majority of
the group.



-- mcf