Judging from the original post, Kazaross [the OP] doesn't feel cheated
in any sense and isn't bitter about the way things went. It was a case
of simple misunderstanding, where both parties involved did the right
thing.

Slightly OT, would I, a player rated around 1500 on a good day,
enjoy/understand Kaspy's book about his match vs the world? I
remember, it was a big thrill participating in it and I got a
[cheaper] thrill in the end by calling Danny "The Dunce" King by that
name, when it was apparent that the game was over.




(Scott) wrote in message om...
http://www.mrfixitonline.com/readTop...tingId=1366118

"Kasparov rather nervously asked me if I had a rating. I replied 2084
and he, not looking very happy, asked why I didn't write it down in
front of the board next to my name. I replied that no one asked me too
and that the Belzberg people knew my rating and only today OK my
playing since I am a client. He then stated that if he had known I was
rated that highly he would have played differently rather than getting
into a very theoretical line. Being aware of the 2000 cutoff I again
appologized for the misunderstanding and we quickly realized that the
Belzberg staff had erred in not telling people to write down their
ratings (these were different people than from the NYC event). I
simply stated "I'm sorry for the confusion, I won't play " and started
to get up and Garry, reiterating that he'd have played differently vs
a rated expert, started resetting the pieces to the starting position
and said we can restart. Being rather shocked by this and what was
over a minute of commotion and confusion I knew the gentlemanly thing
for me to do was to step away and let someone else under 2000 play."