"Kym" wrote in message
...

Speculating that the highest rated player in the world, some how should
not be part of the reunifiocation of the world
title, is crazy! Making assertions that Kasp. *may* hijack the process is
also unhelpful.

Why you missed important point in Mr. Khariton's text:

----
3. Possibly, chess fans do not know that today's situation in world chess
roots back to the year 1993 when Kasparov entered the conspiracy with
Raymond Keene and Nigel Short to destroy the FIDE and the well-functioning
system of World Championship qualification?
----

So, that's reunification is opposite process of Kasparov's doings in 1993.
He divided chess world and FIDE tries to remedy system. He has no moral
rights to play.

By the way, I have read Interview with Garry Kasparov, Part 2, by Hanon W.
Russell ( about the first of a planned three-volume series and it is
entitled Garry Kasparov on My Great Predecessors).
Kasparov's answers are worst and less cogent than in Part 1. It seems that
somebody wrote this unfinished book, without bibliography-(Jerzy would
say-plagiarism), not only Plisetsky. Have you read very subjective
statements about Capablanca?

I cite Kasparov:

Yeah, I think Alekhine, I know this comment, and I think Alekhine was right
to some degree. It's not. Capablanca was a great endgame player, but
Alekhine found that Capablanca never had an appetite for precision. So that'
s why. it happened in the middlegame, it happened in the endgame, more often
in the endgame, that he just, you know, sleeps. So he could win with
second-rate moves, so why to bother, why to step up the pressure on your own
brains. And Alekhine found it, he found a lot of inaccuracies. So that's why
he came up with the right conclusion that under pressure Capablanca may
collapse. And that happened in the match in game 27.
-------
I think we should definitely. one game from his match against Capablanca, it
's either game. mistakes. but either game 11 or game 21. So it's. I'm not
even looking for the precise quality, but it's about Alekhine beating
Capablanca with black in the match, in a world championship match.
---------------------------------------------------------
I have read that one of the English GM, who is very productive chess writer
"wrote more books than he had read". I wonder, if Kasparov read this book
which "he wrote"? That book is some type of "chess hodge - podge," which is
not digestible.

Goran Tomic