Dear Mr. Bourbaki,

Heil Dubya!

I value your personal respect greatly -- because ALMOST invariably we are in
agreement concerning fundamental human values -- and I CERTAINLY do not wish a
public argument with you. What I am about to say, therefore, should be viewed
as explanation, NOT as confrontation.

I responded to "Michael Adams" merely to point out that (s)he/it could not
speak for me and, while I was at it, to clarify my own position somewhat
concerning nationality and the (in my opinion) proper (precise) use of the
English language. One of my important goals is to get humans -- especially
those who use the English language -- to think in human terms (as opposed to
thinking in bourgeois European terms). Thus, I refuse to "talk down" to the
ignorant (or to bow down to the vile) by using language that implies Europe is
the "center" of the world and the most important part of the human species.

Thus, I was not thinking of your TRUE position, but only of what had been
posted by Adams. I don't know whether you have noticed, but I rarely respond
to the Adams-Briarroot-Hanke-StanB-et. al-"axis of evil". (Please note that I
specifically exclude "nomorechess" from this grouping. I believe that you and
I disagree on his realtionships to you, the "axis of evil" and questions of
"truth".) They ALMOST NEVER are worth the time and/or the effort, in
themselves. When I DO respond to one of them, it ALMOST ALWAYS is to make a
point to others, rather than to a member of the "axis of evil". On more than
one occasion, I have suggested the same policy to you, but accept that you
disagree with my judgment in this matter. (You certainly are entitled to your
position on this. As the French saying goes, "Ecco la vita.")

Heute Uhmuhrikkka, Afghanistan und Irak. Morgen die ganze Welt!

Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka uber Alles!

Fraternally,

Jerome Bibuld


gens una sumus