"Todd E. Flambers" wrote
Does it mean that Zita Rajczanyi lied?

No, certainly not! Zita is also a nice and reliable person. But she is
quoted from an article in magazine. Always remember how journalists want to
write nice articles and distort the facts.



This Ellsworth issue reminds me of the same controversy with Spasski. Timman
witnessed Spasski and Fischer talking about the worldwide Jewish conspiracy
and Spasski agreeing with Fischer. There is also this story where Fischer
sits in the back of a car, together with a very Jewish looking Jewish
grandmaster (Hans Ree thought Goebbels would have been delighted to use him
in his anti-Semitic films) and Fischer fulminating about the world-wide
Jewish conspiracy and the grandmaster saying: "yes Bobby, yes Bobby".
Apparently Fischer wears people down, Jew or non-Jew, to a point they start
agreeing with him. Petra Dautov also describes, almost every page, how very
tired she got from the discussions with Fischer.



By the way it's not completely clear who Fischer considers a Jew. According
to the 12th radio-interview he thinks it's a matter of faith:

... they say right in the in the Encyclopaedia Judaica, the most influential
publication, published I think, in the bandit state of Israel, in about
1970, 18 volumes. They say the definition of a Jew is someone who has the
Jewish faith. THAT'S THEIR OWN DEFINITION. That's the Jewish definition.
Pablo: And you not adhere to that faith? Fischer: Obviously I'm not adhering
to that faith. It's a criminal faith, a criminal philosophy of life.

Hitler, Fischer's hero, had a different opinion.....



When she is right it also might be true that Elsworth bought most
of Fischer's property back at the auction and gave it back to Fischer.

Harry Sneider confirmed that he and his son personally sent most of
Fischer property back to Fischer in 1999.

Yes, you'r right. I read that too somewhere. But where?

Peter van der Hoog