The truth is this was a lose-lose proposition. Even I, who argued for
acquittal, realize that for the most part we'd be better off if everyone
with his proclivities would jump off a bridge tomorrow. I'm giving him the
benefit of the doubt because he's intelligent and a chessplayer. If he's
compulsive or psychotic he'll do it again, but I'm hoping he's just horny
and not driven by some unbeatable demon. I'm betting he's smart enough and
sane enough to learn from this mistake and rehabilitate himself.

Nevertheless, if I catch him around here doing the same thing I'll shove a
life-sized rook up his ass so far he'll scream "DOSHVIDANYE BAY-BEEEE."

Angelo


"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...
One thing for sure, Alex Sherzer now knows who his friends really are.

For example, John Fernandez, who has repeatedly proclaimed himself to
be a friend of Sherzer, is difinately not his friend. Fernandez was
the first to blast the news of Sherzer's arrest all over the internet
and has been proclaiming since day-1 that Sherzer was guilty.

So, Fernandez is definitely one on the losing end of the Sherzer
verdict.

Other losers are Bruce Draney, who repeatedly declared that Sherzer
was guilty, and Tim Hanke who wrote that there was an 80% likelihood
that Sherzer would go to prison. Also on the list of losers is
drahmiel and several others.

On the other side of the isle are those who always said that Sherzer
was not guilty and would prevail. These include myself, Alan Fifield,
Paul Rubin, Larry Parr, Jerome Bibuld, Paul Truong, plus
"LeModernCaveman".

This is just a short list. Somebody should compile a complete list of
those who expressed an opinion for or against Alex Sherzer.

Sam Sloan