"Mogath3" wrote in message
...

No SIR YOU OBVIOUSLY missed the point. The POINT is why would one
sympathize
with a 32 year old man who wanted and INTENDED to have sex with a 15 year
old
girl? And anyone that would sympathize with a man like that IS pathetic.


Man, I can sympathize with him as a chess player.
But I don`t sympathize with his lusts for young girls.
Obviously the court agreed that it was an entrapment and there was no sex
with that underaged girl. What`s more Sherzer was seduced by the "clever"
and adult agent not by 15-year-old-innocent-virgin.
So you missed the main point of the whole case. Fortunately you weren`t the
judge.

Regards,
Jerzy