Man, I can sympathize with him as a chess player.
But I don`t sympathize with his lusts for young girls.
Obviously the court agreed that it was an entrapment and there was no sex
with that underaged girl. What`s more Sherzer was seduced by the "clever"
and adult agent not by 15-year-old-innocent-virgin.
So you missed the main point of the whole case. Fortunately you weren`t the
judge.

No, AGAIN you miss the point. The point is he, a 32 year old man, wanted to
have sex with a 15 year old girl. He INTENDED to do just that. The fact that
someone was posing as this 15 year old girl is really moot. He THOUGHT he was
corresponding with a 15 year old and wanted to have sex with WHAT HE THOUGHT
was a 15 year old girl. You find that a 32 year old man wanting to have sex
with a 15 year old girl NORMAL??? I don't care whether it was entrapment or
not. He STILL THOUGHT it was a 15 year old girl. Thats the only REAL point. Any
NORMAL 32 year old man that *I* know doesn't want to have sex with 15 year old
kids. Justify your arguement or twist this around any way you like. He's a
pervert that has a taste for teenage girls, but that means nothing I guess.