"Mogath3" wrote in message
...
Man, I can sympathize with him as a chess player.
But I don`t sympathize with his lusts for young girls.
Obviously the court agreed that it was an entrapment and there was no sex
with that underaged girl. What`s more Sherzer was seduced by the "clever"
and adult agent not by 15-year-old-innocent-virgin.
So you missed the main point of the whole case. Fortunately you weren`t
the
judge.

No, AGAIN you miss the point. The point is he, a 32 year old man, wanted
to
have sex with a 15 year old girl. He INTENDED to do just that. The fact
that
someone was posing as this 15 year old girl is really moot. He THOUGHT he
was
corresponding with a 15 year old and wanted to have sex with WHAT HE
THOUGHT
was a 15 year old girl. You find that a 32 year old man wanting to have
sex
with a 15 year old girl NORMAL??? I don't care whether it was entrapment
or
not. He STILL THOUGHT it was a 15 year old girl. Thats the only REAL
point. Any
NORMAL 32 year old man that *I* know doesn't want to have sex with 15 year
old
kids. Justify your arguement or twist this around any way you like. He's a
pervert that has a taste for teenage girls, but that means nothing I
guess.

ROTFLMAO
Man, can you read his and our thoughts ??
Better read more carefully what I and others have written so far.
So by now I finish my discussion with you until you grow up a little and
show reasonable arguments but not your clairvoyance.

Regards,
Jerzy