"richard kennedy" wrote in message
m...
MR. Bilbuld,

Do you know me well enough to call me, "Jerry"?

Do you mean have I met you? Or do you mean have I read your postings
and writins? Or read about you? For years and years and years?

Or is this just another trick question, like "where is it written"?

I have no doubt you can do the "that depends on what 'is' means" thing
better than MR. Clinton, so I don't know if I "know" you well enough
to call you "Jerry." I will call you "MR. Bilbuld," as that seems to
be the name you request, and I've always believed that people have a
right to name themselves.

Or is it your cultured United Statesian arrogance?

MR. Bilbuld, do you know me well enough to call me that? Of course you
don't. For all you know, I could be some Alabama Bureau of
Investigation agent posing as a chessplayer. Yet that doesn't stop
you, does it? Speaking of arrogance...

By the way, you do get a no-prize for being the first person ever to
refer to me as "cultured." Were more than a hadful of people reading
these posts, you would find a large number of them - those who DO know
me - ROTFLTAO.

I would repeat myself and go into my belief that people have a right
to name themselves -- but your pre-emptive use of "United Statesian"
suggests that that would be a waste of keyboarding. You would
arrogantly and with prejudice continue to refer to me as a "United
Statesian."

I don't remember you at all.

That's ok, MR. Bilbuld. You wouldn't want to remember me. It's better
that way, for both of us. Besides, you don't NEED to remember me. You
ALREADY know, WITHOUT remembering, all you need or want to know about
me.

I begin all colloquies with, "Heil Dubya!" because "Dubya" is our
fuhrer.

And you call me, arrogant, MR. Bilbuld? For the record, I "post."
Colloquy away, if you wish, though.

Next world conflict, get closer to the action. Dubya may be a slow,
manipulated rich kid who has brought his ineptitude from Texas to the
national stage, but he is not anywhere near being like Hitler, the
fuhrer. He is not the fuhrer of the U.S. He is not my fuhrer.

Since you use "our" in yoru reference,I suppose it is only fair -
how's that for lack of arrogance? - to let you claim him as YOUR
fuhrer if you want to, though. In this country, you DO have the right
to proclaim him as your fuhrer, and ought to continue to do so.

In 1944, the Nazi government had a slogan, "Heute Deutschland. Morgen
die
ganze Welt!" (Today Germany. Tomorrow the entire world!)

1944. German. Gotcha, MR. Bilbuld. And today is? And we live where? Is
this nostalgia, or what??

Our fascist leaders

Not at all. Call 'em Republicrats. Call 'em idiots. Call 'em misguided
fools or crooks. They're not facists.

And, for the record, again, they're not MY "fascist leaders." Out of
deference to your use of "our", I will again support your right to
claim YOU have facist leaders.

have gone beyond Uhmuhrikkka (a variation -- including the initials of
the Ku
Klux Klan, which is at the heart of our nation -- on the pronunciation
of
America by our fuhrer)

Dream on. If you regularly salute a fuhrer, claim to be led by
facists, why should I be surprised, MR. Bilbuld, if you claim the
despicable KKK as the heart of YOUR - we've been through your use of
"our" enough, I don't need to repeat myself on this one, do I -
nation?

to Afghanistan and Iraq, so I include those two
countries in describing the current situation, while projecting a "good"
U. S.
citizen's actions toward the future.

Shoot. I mean, do we have to go through that whole logical exercise
again about what a "good" bomb is? I mean, is a "good" bomb one that
blows up a whole lot of people and things? Or is a "good" bomb one
that refuses to blow up, and thereby hurts nobody? Your use of "
"good" " is tedious.

Especially since I have not supported the occupation of Afghanistan,
or Iraq; as well as the presence of U.S. troops in the Balkins and
another 120 or so countries...

Then, the national anthem of Nazi Germany was "Deutschland, Deutschland
uber
Alles!" (Germany, Germany over all else!) I don't think I have to
explain the
second line of my usual closing further here.

I don't think you have to explain what your words mean, MR. Bilbuld. I
am at a loss as to why they are so important to you, though.

I mean, if I were to sign every posting of mine, "it's the quicker
picker-upper," you would probably understand what I was referring to,
but you might wonder why I was constantly repeating it. Or do I
arrogantly impute too much, here?

Finally and parenthetically, I ask those among my compatriots who may be
able
to think independently whether the attacks on the Twin Towers and
Pentagon of
11 September 2001 -- which I have concluded were organized and
implemented by
our own "leaders" -- should be compared to Kristalnacht, which was
perpetrated
by the Nazi Party as the beginning of the formalized governmental
attacks on
the Jewish People by the Nazi German government or the date of the
Reichstag
fire -- also perpetrated by the Nazi Party government -- to use as an
excuse to
formally implement the fascist state, as we normally recognize it.

Not WE, MR. Bilbuld. Etc.

Your conclusion wavers between delusion and wish-fulfillment, it would
appear. "Formalized governmental attacks." Oh! If only it were true!!

My disagreement with you has nothing to do with lacking independent
thought, mind you. I've thought it through, and argued it through with
my comrades. Doesn't fly.

As for the question of "Where is it written?" Of course, I wouldn't
have
provided identification,

YEP.


If I get away with it and win a "federal
case", it's possible that NONE OF US will have to jump through THAT
hoop.

And I'M the arrogant one?? You were hassling a bunch of low-paid
workers, MR. Bilbuld. In YOUR mind, perhaps, you were striking a blow
for freedom, but when the folks came home and soaked their feet at
night and kissed the kids goodnight, your were just another hassle in
a worker's long day.

To
my mind it would be a blow, albeit a light blow, against our fascist
rulers.
If I don't get away with it, one of my minor boasts is that I'm one of
the few
persons who actually served (short) time during the "civil rights
movement",
because I treasonably objected to Jim Crow -- In New York, by the way,
NOT
Mississippi. (I hope they allow me to keep my nitroglycerine on my
person.)

!

I won't bother to comment on your asinine question concerning "a working
guy",
except to say that they "were only doing their duty". (I don't think
you will
understand that last clause, but I may be wrong.)

Thanks for the non-comment, MR. Bilbuld. Putting up with your
shenanigans, delusional as they were, was just an everyday thing for
those working people. Ho-hum. They've already likely forgotten you,
replaced by the next scofflaw. To compare their actions with those who
followed the real fuhrer's orders - and to do it with a straight face
as you did - is to reveal your true solidarity with the working people
of the world. Or, whatever.

Heil Dubya!

Heute Uhmuhrikkka, Afghanistan und Irak. Morgen die ganze Welt!

Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka uber Alles!

(Was 11 September 2001 Kristalnacht or the date of the Reichstag
fire?)


Wow. It's enough to give up newsgroups.

Think hard, MR. Bilbuld. Think very hard... You met me -- when? And
when you meet me -- what do you want to do with me??

Rick

Welcome to RGCM, Rick. I like you already.



Regards,

Matt