Dear Mr. Bourbaki,

Heil Dubya!

I am aware of the history of United Statesian juries and their treatment of,
not only colonials and immigrants, but also United Statesian "radicals".
"Plain ordinary" United Statesians -- in "criminal" cases, as opposed to civil
suits -- generally have not fared so badly, at the hands of U. S. petit juries,
unless they were framed as "reds" or "labor agitators".

(Jerome Bibuld) wrote in message
...(to John Fernandez):
An excellent point to extend the logic of those who wish to call both
Simpson
and Sherzer guilty of crimes which juries have ruled they did not commit!
[I mention Simpson only because some ass holes have linked his trial
(persecution) to that of Sherzer on rgc.]

Dear Mr. Bibuld,

With all due respect to juries, they are subject to human fallibilities, and
consequently sometimes they might not necessarily make the right decisions.
For examples, please consider the historical record of some verdicts reached
by some "all-white juries" in the United States.

'We should have no law but the inclination of the moment.'
--George Eliot (The Mill on the Floss)

--Nick


Heute Uhmuhrikkka, Afghanistan und Irak. Morgen die ganze Welt!

Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka uber Alles!

(Was 11 September 2001 Kristalnacht or the date of the Reichstag fire.)

Fraternally,

Jerome Bibuld


gens una sumus