..
(In which Nick Borebackatus reached for the other arrow in his quiver,
his famous ego stroke list, the Reader's Digest version of all the
nice things people have said about him.)


Other posters have characterized Nick as an outright liar, but I see
him more as a propagandist or ad-man (in the service of himself, of
course)


If you look more closely, you will see the answer for yourself: Nick-the-liar
always presents these "selected," favorable snippetts he has collected over
time, as if they were a random sample of feedback, *deliberately* ommitting any
negative comments by a variety of posters, whose names exactly match his
so-called "trolls" list, by no small coincidence.
This, my friends, is called lying. Deception. Dishonesty. A gasbag?
Perhaps. A pompous buffoon? Certainly. But even a pompous buffoon might at
least manage a to steer clear of outright deceptions and lies. "Borebacktatus
twaddle" is not merely boring, it is lowdown, disgusting stuff.




Two different opinions seem to vie here, regarding the root cause of Mickey
Adams' language peculiarities: illiteracy vs. drunkenness. I vote for the
latter, but then
again, he may just have a very strong accent, aggravated by a little alchohol
and fast typing.
OTOH, he *could* be both illiterate *and* drunk ! :-)





(I had called Nick a "trolling buffoon". Overly generous, I realize,
but I was trying to be nice.)


Nick-the-liar is not exactly a troll. He calls everyone else a troll, but we
need to remember that true trolls are fairly rare, and mainly found underneath
bridges.



Susan Polgar:
"Nick, Thank you....I am glad to see posters like you."

Now, this little snippet might tempt the unwary reader into believing
that GM Polgar had reviewed the


Queen's Knight odds to any man.....


But I never took my hand off....